KEY EMPLOYMENT LAW ISSUES

This checklist provides guidance on the various employment and labor law issues that may arise when opening a start-up or expanding a business. It covers federal law and also highlights California law, particularly in subject areas that federal law does not typically address. Many venture capital-financed start-ups are in California, and California law generally tends to be more protective of employee rights than the law of other states.

For a practice note on employment law issues related to start-up companies, see Start-up Businesses and Growing Companies: Key Employment Law Issues (Federal and CA). Also see Equity and Incentive Compensation Arrangements for Startup Companies. For guidance on employment law issues related to start-up companies in New York, see Start-Up Businesses and Growing Companies: Key Employment Law Issues (NY) and Start-Up Businesses and Growing Companies: Key Employment Law Issues Checklist (NY).

Applicable Labor and Employment Laws

Conduct a due diligence review of the employer’s compliance with applicable federal and state employment and labor laws to help ensure that the start-up or growing company can secure venture capital financing in the future.

Consider the following major areas when drafting agreements and policies for start-up and growing companies:

Offer Letters and Formal Employment Agreements

Consider the following key points on offer letters and formal employment agreements.

  • Offer letter considerations. Start-ups and growing companies commonly deliver offer letters to successful candidates for non-executive positions. While offer letters often provide less detail than formal employment agreements, they should set forth the key terms of employment. For annotated non-jurisdictional and state-specific offer letters, see the Employment and Compensation Contracts column of Employment Contracts State Expert Forms Chart.
  • Formal employment agreements considerations. Start-ups and growing companies generally use formal employment agreements when hiring executives or top managers and other highly compensated individuals. For information on executive employment agreements, see Executive Employment Agreement Negotiation and Drafting (Pro-employer) and Executive Employment Agreement (Pro-employer).

Restrictive Covenants

Consider a restrictive covenant to help the start-up employer prevent an employee from working for a competitor, misappropriating a company’s trade secrets or other confidential information, soliciting customers, or soliciting other employees to leave the company. But, as addressed below, note California’s particularly restrictive stance towards non-compete agreements.

Employee Handbooks and Key Workplace Policies

Advise the start-up employer to help avoid misunderstandings about the employer-employee relationship by distributing well-crafted employee handbooks.

  • Employee handbooks and required employment policies. An employee handbook that contains clear policies can protect the employer from employee allegations of harassment, wrongful termination, and discrimination. It can establish clear expectations for appropriate behavior in the workplace by articulating a code of employee conduct. For an annotated employee handbook, see Employee Handbook. For checklists of provisions to include in both non-jurisdictional and state-specific employee handbooks (including required workplace policies), see the Employee Handbooks column of Employment Policies State Expert Forms and Checklists Chart.

Risks of Using Independent Contractors in Lieu of Employees

Start-up employers often hire workers and classify them as independent contractors who are exempt from coverage under many labor and employment laws. If done properly, this may be an effective way to for the start-up employer to save money and reduce administrative burdens. But it is also necessary to advise the start-up employer of the risks of improperly classifying workers as independent contractors, including the following:

  • Potential tax liability. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and/or the corresponding state revenue agency may decide that the workers should be classified as employees, which would result in tax liability for the employer.
  • Potential liability for unpaid wages. The U.S. Department of Labor could also decide that the workers should be classified as employees entitled to overtime pay and other benefits.
  • Potential unemployment compensation liability. The state unemployment agency may decide that the workers should be classified as employees entitled to unemployment compensation.
  • Potential workers’ compensation liability. There is also the risk of liability for worker’s compensation coverage should a worker’s compensation commission conclude that independent contractor status was unsupported.

For more information on tests for determining if workers are independent contractors and potential misclassification risks, see Independent Contractor Tests and Risks of Worker Misclassification. See also Independent Contractor Red Flag Checklist. For information on independent contractor tests in California, see Independent Contractor Tests (CA). For additional information on state laws on independent contractors, see the Independent Contractors State Practice Notes Chart.

For information on independent contractor agreements, see Independent Contractor Agreements: Major Negotiation, Drafting, and Legal Issues and Independent Contractor Agreement Drafting Checklist. For an annotated non-jurisdictional independent contractor agreement and state-specific annotated independent contractor agreements, see the Independent Contractors and Interns column of Wage and Hour State Expert Forms Chart.